Home / Compare

Trueyy vs the old way

Exam tools watch the screen. We read the interview.

Most proctoring software was built for timed tests. It locks the browser, snaps webcam photos, and counts tab switches. That made sense for a one-way exam. A live, two-way hiring conversation is a different problem, and it needs a different tool.

Capability
Traditional proctoring
Trueyy
Designed for live two-way interviews
No
Yes
Detects AI tool use in real time
Limited
Yes
Specifically detects Cluely and InterviewCoder
No
Yes
Weighs several signals together
Rule-based
Yes
Runs inside Zoom, Meet, and Teams
No
Yes
Light footprint for candidates
Heavy
Yes
No video stored on third-party servers
No
Yes
Plain-language timeline after the call
No
Yes
Keeps a human in the final decision
Varies
Yes
Built for recruiters, not exam halls
No
Yes
Why lockdown tools fall short

They guard the wrong door

Locking a browser stops a candidate from opening a tab. It does nothing about a phone propped behind the laptop, a Cluely session on a second device, or answers read from a printed sheet. The cheating moved. Most proctoring tools did not.

Why Trueyy fits live hiring

It reads intent, not just motion

Trueyy was made for the conversation, not the quiz. It looks at how an answer gets built and where attention goes, then gives your interviewer a read they can actually use while the call is still live. Context, not snapshots.

If you run timed certification exams at scale, traditional proctoring still has its place. If you run live interviews and want to know whether the person actually did the thinking, that is exactly what Trueyy is for.

See the difference on a live call

Book a demo and we will show you what a real-time read looks like next to a static proctoring report.

See early access